Unlocked in UK: The Non-Dom Exit and What It Means for Financing a UK Property

London super-prime townhouse representing non-dom sellers and buyers financing a property transition

Through 2025, London's super-prime market saw a distinctive shift. A wave of long-resident non-domiciled owners sold their principal UK residences, responding to the abolition of the remittance basis and the wider tax reforms affecting non-doms. Many of these sellers did not leave the London property market altogether. They retained a presence in the city, but at a lower price point, often acquiring smaller homes in the £7 million to £10 million range rather than the £15 million-plus properties they were exiting.

Speak to GMG about releasing equity from your UK property. Donald Klip, Co-Founder and CIO, Global Mortgage Group.

[email protected] | +65 9773 0273 | www.gmg.asia 

At the same time, a new generation of international buyers has stepped into the space these sellers vacated. This is not a market in retreat. Beauchamp Estates' annual survey of London transactions above £15 million describes 2025 as a year of resilient, selective activity at the very top of the market, with demand now focused on quality, convenience and long-term value rather than the tax planning considerations that shaped the previous decade of ownership.

Why This Shift Creates a Financing Need, Not Just a Transaction

Every non-dom exit sale creates at least two financing questions. The seller downsizing into a smaller London home often needs to bridge the gap between the sale of their existing property and the purchase of the new one, particularly when timelines do not align, or when part of the proceeds from the original sale are held offshore and take time to repatriate. The buyer stepping into the market, meanwhile, is frequently structuring their purchase through a trust, a family investment company or an offshore holding vehicle for reasons entirely separate from the old non-dom remittance rules, such as succession planning, asset protection, or simply the structure their family office already uses globally.

"The non-dom story gets told as a tax story, and it is one. But underneath it is a financing story that most people miss. Sellers need short-term bridging to manage the gap between transactions. Buyers need a lender who can underwrite a purchase held through a BVI company or a Jersey trust without treating that structure as a red flag rather than a normal feature of how international wealth is held."
- Donald Klip, Co-Founder and CIO, Global Mortgage Group

What Has Actually Changed for Financing Purposes

The end of the remittance basis and its replacement with a residence-based regime changes how and when UK-resident non-doms are taxed on foreign income and gains, but it does not, on its own, change UK mortgage lending criteria. What it has changed is buyer behaviour: shorter intended holding periods for some owners, more scrutiny of total cost of ownership including tax, and a greater willingness among family offices to hold UK property through structures optimised for the new regime rather than the old one.

For a lender, this means underwriting has to keep pace with structures that did not exist, or were rare, a decade ago. GMG's approach is to treat the ownership vehicle as a design choice to be understood and accommodated, not an obstacle, structuring bridging facilities against trusts, corporate holding structures and family investment companies as a matter of course, with underwriting built around the underlying beneficial owner's global financial position.

What Non-Dom Sellers and Buyers Should Check Before Financing

  • Whether sale proceeds are held onshore or offshore, and how quickly they can be repatriated or deployed
  • Whether the new purchase will be held in the same structure as the old property, or a different one
  • Whether existing lenders will finance a purchase through a trust or offshore company, or whether a specialist facility is needed
  • The realistic timeline gap between selling one property and completing on the next

About Global Mortgage Group

Global Mortgage Group (GMG) is a Singapore-headquartered cross-border real estate finance firm operating across 23+ jurisdictions, specialising in equity release, bridging loans and structured property finance for international property owners. GMG works with private clients, family offices and their advisers to unlock capital held in prime residential real estate.

Donald Klip, Co-Founder and CIO

[email protected] | +65 9773 0273 | www.gmg.asia

Unlocked in Thailand: Leasehold vs. Freehold in Thailand: How Your Ownership Structure Affects Your Borrowing Power

Comparison of a Bangkok freehold condominium and a Phuket leasehold villa representing Thailand property ownership structures

When foreign buyers purchase property in Thailand, the question of ownership structure is often treated as a legal formality, something to sort out with a lawyer and then file away. In reality, the structure you choose at the point of purchase has profound and lasting consequences for your ability to access finance later. It is one of the most important financial decisions a foreign property owner in Thailand will make, and most people do not realise it until they need to borrow.

To understand how your ownership structure affects your financing options in Thailand, speak to Donald Klip at Global Mortgage Group.

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

The Two Main Structures for Foreign Owners

Foreign nationals in Thailand generally hold property in one of two ways: freehold condominium ownership under the Condominium Act, or leasehold ownership of land-based property such as villas, houses, shophouses, and commercial buildings.

Freehold condo ownership means you hold outright title to your unit. The Chanote deed, the highest grade of Thai land title, is registered in your name at the Land Department. You can sell it, transfer it, mortgage it, and pass it on. Within the 49% foreign quota of any given building, this is genuine, clean, unencumbered ownership.

Leasehold ownership is fundamentally different. Under a leasehold arrangement, you do not own the land or the structure built on it. You own the right to use and occupy it for a defined period, typically 30 years, sometimes with contractual renewal options for one or two further 30-year terms. When the lease expires, the land and everything on it reverts to the landowner unless the lease is renewed.

Why Freehold Condos Are the Stronger Borrowing Basis

From a lender's perspective, freehold condominium ownership is the cleanest collateral available to a foreign property owner in Thailand. The title is clear, registered, and unambiguous. Ownership can be independently verified at the Land Department. The asset can, in principle, be sold to recover a lender's funds in the event of default.

This does not mean Thai banks will lend against freehold condos owned by foreigners, as we explored in the previous article, they will not. But it does mean that private lenders, non-bank financial institutions, and cross-border specialists are more willing to consider freehold condo security than leasehold. When structuring a bridging loan or equity release facility against Thai property, a freehold condo title is the starting point that most specialist lenders will work with.

KEY POINT
Freehold condo means a stronger borrowing basis. Leasehold means significantly more complex. The structure you hold determines not just whether you can borrow, but how much, at what cost, and through which channels.

The Leasehold Lending Problem

Leasehold security is challenging for lenders for several reasons that compound one another.

First, the diminishing nature of the asset. A 30-year lease started in 2010 now has fewer than 15 years remaining. A lender advancing funds today on a 5-year term is taking security against an asset that will have only 10 years left at maturity. The shorter the remaining lease, the lower the residual value, and the less comfort a lender can take from the collateral.

Second, enforceability. A lender who takes security over a leasehold interest needs to be confident they can enforce that security, step into the lease, sell the leasehold interest, or otherwise recover their funds, if the borrower defaults. In Thailand, leasehold enforcement by a non-resident lender involves legal complexity that not all private lenders are willing to navigate.

Third, renewal uncertainty. Many leasehold arrangements in Thailand include contractual rights of renewal for additional 30-year terms. But a contractual right is not the same as a guaranteed right. Disputes over lease renewal are not uncommon in Thailand, and a lender taking security over a leasehold property needs to assess the renewal risk as part of its credit analysis. Properties with short remaining terms and uncertain renewal positions are very difficult to finance.

Thai Company Structures: A Third Category

Some foreign property owners, particularly those who acquired land-based property before leasehold structures became standard, or those who wanted to own land outright rather than lease it, hold their Thai property through a Thai limited company. In this structure, the foreign national owns shares in a Thai company, and the Thai company holds the land title.

Thai company structures occupy an uncomfortable legal position. They are widespread and have been tolerated by authorities for decades, but they sit in a grey zone: the intent of Thai law is that land should be owned by Thai nationals, and using a company structure to circumvent this is technically a violation of the spirit if not always the letter of the law. Regulatory attitudes toward this structure have tightened and relaxed at various points over the years, creating uncertainty for owners.

From a financing perspective, Thai company structures are the most complex of the three categories. A lender taking security over a Thai company-held property is effectively lending against a corporate entity whose shares happen to be collateralised by real estate. The legal due diligence required is extensive, the enforcement path in a default scenario is more complicated, and many specialist lenders will not consider this structure at all.

"Your ownership structure is not just a legal detail. It is the single most important factor in determining whether you can access the equity in your Thai property, and if so, how."
- Donald Klip, Global Mortgage Group

Global Mortgage Group works with all three ownership structures. If you are unsure what options your Thai property holding opens up, contact Donald Klip to discuss.

What This Means for Borrowing Strategy

If you own a freehold condo in Thailand and want to access equity, you are in the best position available to a foreign owner. You have the cleanest title, the strongest collateral, and the widest range of lenders who will at least consider your application.

If you own a leasehold property, you need to understand the remaining term, the renewal provisions, and how different lenders view those factors before approaching anyone for finance. A leasehold with 25 years remaining and a documented renewal clause in a reputable development is a very different proposition to a leasehold with 8 years remaining and no renewal documentation.

If you own through a Thai company, specialist legal and financial advice is essential before approaching any lender. The company structure, the shareholder arrangements, the land title, and the regulatory history of the property all need to be clearly understood before a financing conversation can meaningfully begin.

In all cases, the starting point is the same: understand what you own, understand what it means for your financing options, and then engage with lenders who actually work in this space. Global Mortgage Group operates across all three structures and can help you map what is possible for your specific situation.

Ready To Unlock Your Thai Property?

Global Mortgage Group specialises in cross-border property finance for foreign owners across Thailand.

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

Unlocked in Thailand: The Paper Wealth Problem: Foreign Owners Are Asset-Rich and Cash-Poor

Foreign property owner reviewing unrealised equity and paper wealth from a Bangkok condo investment

There is a particular kind of financial frustration that is hard to explain to someone who has not experienced it. You are not broke. By any objective measure, you are wealthy. You own real estate in one of Asia's most dynamic markets. The value is there. The numbers confirm it. But the money, the actual, usable, deployable capital, is nowhere to be found.

If your Thai property equity is trapped and you need liquidity, Global Mortgage Group may be able to help. Contact Donald Klip to discuss your options.

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

This is the paper wealth problem. And for foreign property owners in Thailand, it is not a temporary inconvenience. It is a structural condition that affects how you can invest, how you can plan, and in some cases how you can live.

What Paper Wealth Actually Means

Paper wealth is the gap between what an asset is worth on paper and what you can actually do with that value. For most asset classes, that gap is relatively small. Listed shares can be sold in seconds. Bank deposits can be withdrawn on demand. Even property in most developed markets can be borrowed against fairly efficiently, turning a percentage of its value into usable capital within weeks.

Thai property owned by foreigners is different. The gap between paper value and accessible value is enormous, and in many cases it is total. The asset is worth what it is worth. But unless you sell it, the value is completely locked up. Consider some realistic scenarios.

The Bangkok Condo Investor

A British professional bought a two-bedroom condo in the Sukhumvit corridor in 2012 for THB 6 million. The same unit is now valued at THB 14 million, approximately SGD 530,000 or GBP 320,000 at current exchange rates. The unit generates rental income that covers service charges and produces a modest yield.

On paper, this person has made an excellent investment. They have THB 8 million in unrealised capital gain and a productive asset generating income. But if they need GBP 100,000 for a business opportunity in the UK, to help a child with a property purchase, or to fund a renovation of another asset, they cannot access any of it without selling the Thai condo. Selling means transaction costs, potential capital gains exposure, loss of the rental income stream, and the need to time the market correctly. The paper wealth is real. The practical wealth is zero until the asset is sold.

The Phuket Villa Owner

An Australian couple retired to Phuket in 2015 and purchased a villa on a 30-year leasehold for THB 18 million. The villa has appreciated. The leasehold still has 19 years to run. They live in it for six months each year and rent it for the other six, generating income that covers most of their living costs in Thailand.

They would like to buy a small apartment in Melbourne to have a base when they return to Australia. The Melbourne property would cost AUD 650,000. They have a combined superannuation balance of AUD 280,000. They are short. Their Thai villa is worth THB 25 million, they have THB 7 million in unrealised appreciation and a significant asset base. But they cannot borrow against a Thai leasehold villa through any conventional channel, cannot show a Thai bank any qualifying Thai income, and selling the villa would destroy the retirement structure they have built. The paper wealth is substantial. The practical options are very limited.

The Hong Kong Portfolio Investor

A Hong Kong-based finance professional has been accumulating Thai condominiums since 2008 as part of a diversified real estate portfolio. She owns three units across Bangkok and one in Phuket. Combined current market value: approximately THB 55 million. All units are fully paid, with zero outstanding obligations.

She wants to acquire two more units in a new Bangkok development she believes will outperform over the next decade. The total purchase price is THB 22 million. She has the income to service a loan, the assets to collateralise one, and the financial sophistication to manage leverage. What she does not have is a lender willing to extend Thai property-backed credit to a Hong Kong national. Her paper wealth in Thai real estate is THB 55 million. Her ability to use that wealth as a platform for further investment is, through conventional channels, essentially nil.

"The paper wealth problem is not about the value of your asset. It is about the gap between that value and what the financial system will allow you to do with it."
- Donald Klip, Global Mortgage Group

Global Mortgage Group specialises in finding financing solutions where conventional banks have said no. If you are sitting on trapped Thai property equity, contact Donald Klip to explore what is possible.

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

The Opportunity Cost Is Real

Paper wealth that cannot be accessed is not just an inconvenience. It has a real financial cost. Capital that is locked in an illiquid asset cannot be deployed elsewhere. Investment opportunities are missed. Business ventures cannot be funded. Portfolio rebalancing is impossible. Lifestyle decisions, where to live, what to buy, how to plan retirement, are constrained by an inability to access value that unambiguously exists.

For foreign property owners in Thailand, the opportunity cost of trapped equity compounds over time. Every year that passes is another year that capital which could have been working, generating returns, funding expansion, supporting life goals, sits locked inside an asset that the financial system treats as effectively illiquid.

THE NUMBERS
Thailand's condo market has seen significant appreciation in key urban markets over the past 15 years. Foreign owners who bought in prime Bangkok locations between 2008 and 2015 are often sitting on 80-150% unrealised gains. In Phuket, beachfront and hillside villas have seen similar or greater appreciation. The aggregate trapped equity across the foreign owner population in Thailand runs into the tens of billions of baht. Almost none of it is accessible through conventional finance.

Why People Accept the Trap

Given how significant the paper wealth problem is, why do so many foreign owners simply accept it? The most common reason is that they do not know there is an alternative. The Thai banking system's refusal to lend to foreigners is so well known, and so often encountered, that many owners assume it represents the totality of what is possible. They have asked a Thai bank, been told no, and concluded that no means no, everywhere, to everyone, for everything. This is understandable but incorrect.

A second reason is risk aversion. Some foreign owners, having made a successful long-term investment in Thai property, are reluctant to introduce leverage. They would rather leave the equity locked than risk complicating an investment that has served them well. This is a legitimate choice, but it should be an informed one, made after understanding what options exist and at what cost.

A third reason is simply inertia. The paper wealth problem does not announce itself loudly. It sits quietly in the background until the moment you actually need the capital, and then it becomes urgent and stressful. Addressing it proactively, before the need becomes acute, is almost always more efficient than scrambling for solutions under time pressure.

Turning Paper Wealth into Real Capital

The good news is that the market for foreign property finance in Thailand is not static. It is developing. The combination of significant foreign ownership, substantial trapped equity, and zero supply from Thai banks has created a clear commercial opportunity. Private lenders, cross-border specialists, and non-bank financial institutions have moved to fill the gap, and the solutions available today are meaningfully more sophisticated than they were a decade ago.

Kai Faak, the traditional Thai private lending mechanism, has been used by Thai property owners for generations and is increasingly being structured in ways that work for foreign owners. Bridging loan products designed specifically for foreign-owned Thai real estate now exist through specialist lenders. Cross-border equity release, using the value of Thai property as part of a broader collateral picture assessed by offshore lenders, is becoming more accessible as the market matures.

None of these solutions are as cheap or as simple as a conventional bank mortgage. They are priced to reflect the additional complexity, the non-standard collateral, and the specialist nature of the lending. But for a foreign property owner who has been sitting on significant unrealised equity, the cost of accessing it is typically far lower than the opportunity cost of continuing to leave it trapped. The rest of this series is devoted to exactly that: turning the paper wealth of foreign-owned Thai property into real, usable capital.

Ready To Unlock Your Thai Property?

Global Mortgage Group specialises in cross-border property finance for foreign owners across Thailand.

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

The Klip Report: The Opportunity Cost of Doing Nothing

Stacked coins beside a rising market chart representing the opportunity cost of holding idle capital during a market dislocation

The cost of doing nothing is always something. · gmg.asia

In every major dislocation, wealth doesn't disappear. It transfers.

The market is not broken. It is repricing. And in every repricing in history, the winners share one characteristic. They had cash available when everyone else was frozen.

By Donald Klip, Co-Founder · Global Mortgage Group · gmg.asia

I have been in institutional finance through four major market dislocations. The Asian financial crisis. The dot-com collapse. The GFC. COVID. Each one felt, in the moment, like chaos. In retrospect, each one was the single best buying opportunity of its era, for the people who could act.

What we are experiencing right now is different in character but identical in structure. It is not a single crisis. It is a convergence of rate dislocations, geopolitical realignment, technology disruption, and credit market stress, all arriving simultaneously. The number of genuine, asymmetric opportunities I am seeing across asset classes right now is extraordinary. I have not seen a target-rich environment like this since 2009.

And the painful truth, the thing I keep saying to clients, to private bankers, to advisers across our network, is that most of the people who should be participating cannot. Not because the opportunities aren't there. Because their capital is locked.

"In 2009, the people who bought were not the bravest. They were the most liquid. The same is true today."

The Dislocations: Six Opportunities You May Not See Again

Private Markets

Pre-IPO access, now open to HNW for the first time. Secondary platforms, Forge Global, Hiive, EquityZen, have democratised access to pre-IPO positions in SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic that were institutional-only five years ago. The window before index-driven forced buying closes at listing.

Private Credit · Asia

Banks retrenching. Yields not seen since 2007. Thai bond defaults. Indonesian developer stress. Basel III squeezing bank balance sheets across Southeast Asia. The result: creditworthy borrowers paying 10–14% to non-bank lenders. For investors with capital to deploy, this is a once-in-a-decade yield environment. 10–14% p.a.

Commercial Real Estate

Global CRE distress creating generational entry points. US office vacancy at historic highs. Hong Kong commercial property under severe pressure. European retail repricing. Distressed asset sales at 40–60 cents on the dollar are available to buyers who can move without financing contingencies, i.e., those with cash.

Asia Property · Stressed

Thai and Indonesian developer stress creating acquisition windows. STARK and other Thai corporate defaults have created motivated sellers across Bangkok and Phuket. Indonesian developers facing OJK pressure are offering assets at significant discounts. Both markets require speed. And speed requires liquidity.

Hard Assets · Macro

Fed on hold. Dollar under pressure. Hard assets repricing. With the US 10-year anchored above 4.5% and the Fed unable to cut without reigniting inflation, the macro setup for hard assets, gold, real assets, commodity plays, is the strongest it has been since the early 2000s. Currency debasement is not a theory. It is a budget line.

AI Infrastructure

The picks-and-shovels play on AI, before the crowd arrives. Data centres. Power infrastructure. Cooling technology. Semiconductor supply chains. The AI revolution has a physical layer most investors are ignoring while chasing software names. The infrastructure buildout is a decade-long capital cycle. Entry points exist today that will not in 18 months.

The Common Thread

Every one of these opportunities requires the same thing. Cash. Now.

Not next quarter. Not after your property sells. Not when the bank approves your facility. Now. While the window is open.

On the IPOs, One Paragraph, Because It Deserves One

Last issue I covered SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic in detail, so I will not repeat myself. But I will say this: the three listings together represent something structurally new. For the first time, retail and HNW investors can access pure-play AI exposure at scale. Index mechanics, Nasdaq-100 weighting, will trigger forced institutional buying at listing that creates a predictable, mechanical demand surge. The pre-IPO secondary window, available now on platforms like Forge and Hiive, closes the moment these companies list. After that, you are buying with everyone else. These are not compelling because they are hyped. They are compelling because the mechanics are real.

SpaceX + xAI: $1.75T · Listed June 2026
OpenAI: $1T+ · September 2026
Anthropic: $965B · October 2026

"The pre-IPO window closes at listing. After that, you are buying with everyone else, at a price that already reflects the opportunity."

The GMG Bridge: Turning Idle Equity Into Dry Powder

Your real estate is not just an asset. Right now, it is your entry ticket.

Across our lending markets, long-term international property owners are sitting on significant unrealised equity, equity that is doing nothing while the opportunities above are moving. The Singapore condominium that has doubled since 2019. The Sydney house purchased for school fees that is now worth three times what it cost. The Miami apartment that generates modest rent but holds $800K in untapped equity.

GMG structures short-term equity release and bridging loans against all of these assets, for foreign nationals, expats, and international investors that conventional banks will not touch. No income documentation in many cases. No TDSR in Singapore. No W-2 in the US. Structured around the asset, not the borrower's tax return.

Indicative terms in 48 hours. Facilities from $500K to $50M. Twelve to thirty-six month terms. Designed for exactly this kind of moment.

  • Singapore: Up to 80% LTV. No TDSR. 2–4 week close. GCBs, condos, shophouses, landed.
  • United States: Up to 65% LTV. No W-2, no US tax returns. Asset-based qualification.
  • Australia: Up to 65% LTV. Non-resident programme. Overseas income accommodated.
  • 🇬🇧 United Kingdom: Up to 70% LTV. Prime Central London. Offshore structures accommodated.
  • 🇹🇭 Thailand: Senior secured. Bangkok, Phuket, resort assets. Active pipeline.

A Note for Private Bankers and Advisers

If you have clients who recognise the opportunities above but lack the immediate liquidity to act, that is a solvable problem. A short-term bridge against Singapore property, a US asset-backed facility, or an Australian equity release can create the dry powder they need in weeks.

We work with private banks, EAMs, and independent advisers across Asia on a confidential, referral basis. Indicative terms within 48 hours. If you have a client situation, reach out directly. We move quietly and we move fast.

The Window Is Open, But Not Indefinitely

Start the conversation. 48-hour indicative terms.

gmg.asia · [email protected]

The Unlocked Series, Free at GMG.asia

Our complete guide to equity release for international property owners. 55+ articles on the US. 23 on Australia. 18 on Singapore. Thailand launching soon. No paywall. No sales pitch.

🇺🇸 Unlocked in America 🇦🇺 Unlocked in Australia 🇸🇬 Unlocked in Singapore 🇹🇭 Unlocked in Thailand, 🇬🇧 Unlocked in United Kingdom, coming soon.

Unlocked in UK: Equity Release vs Bridging vs Remortgaging — Which One Actually Fits a UK Property Owner

Comparison of a London townhouse and financing paperwork representing remortgage, bridging, and equity release options

Owners of prime London property who want to access capital without selling generally reach for one of three tools: a conventional remortgage, a bridging loan, or a structured equity release facility. The three are often used interchangeably in conversation, but they solve different problems, move at different speeds, and suit very different borrower profiles.

Speak to GMG about releasing equity from your UK property. Donald Klip, Co-Founder and CIO, Global Mortgage Group. 

[email protected] | +65 9773 0273 | www.gmg.asia

A remortgage replaces an existing mortgage, or adds borrowing to an unencumbered property, through a mainstream lender. It is the cheapest option by headline rate, but it is also the slowest and the most rigid. UK high-street lenders assess remortgage applications against standard affordability criteria built around PAYE income, UK tax returns and a conventional credit history. For an owner whose income is earned in Hong Kong dollars, Emirati dirhams or Singapore dollars, or whose property is held through a British Virgin Islands company or a family trust, this process frequently stalls, not because the underlying asset or the borrower's wealth is in question, but because the file does not fit the template.

Bridging Finance: Speed Over Rate

Bridging loans exist to move quickly. A typical bridge can complete in two to four weeks rather than the two to three months a mainstream remortgage might take, because the lender is underwriting primarily against the property and a credible exit strategy rather than a granular income assessment. This makes bridging the natural choice for auction purchases, for owners who need to complete a onward purchase before a sale closes, or for anyone facing a genuine deadline, a probate distribution, a divorce settlement, or a business opportunity with its own timeline.

The trade-off is cost. Bridging rates sit meaningfully above mainstream mortgage rates, and the facility is designed to be temporary, typically six to eighteen months, with a clear exit through sale, refinance, or another liquidity event already identified before the loan is drawn.

"The question we ask every client is not which product sounds cheapest. It is what actually needs to happen, and by when. A bridge that costs more per month but closes in three weeks is frequently the lower-cost option once you price in the deal that was lost, or the discount accepted, while waiting for a mainstream lender to finish underwriting."
Donald Klip, Co-Founder and CIO, Global Mortgage Group

Structured Equity Release: Built Around the Borrower, Not the Postcode

Between these two sits structured equity release, asset-backed lending designed specifically for owners whose financial life spans multiple jurisdictions. Rather than declining an application because income arrives in three currencies or because the freehold sits inside an offshore holding company, a structured facility is built around the borrower's actual circumstances: their full asset base, their exit strategy, and the jurisdiction in which they intend to deploy the proceeds.

This is where GMG's cross-border underwriting model differs most from a conventional UK lender. A facility can be sized against the property's value and the client's global balance sheet rather than a narrow UK income test, drawn down in weeks rather than months, and structured with interest retained within the facility so there are no monthly repayments required during the term, a structure particularly suited to owners whose income is irregular, offshore, or tied up in a business they are actively running.

Choosing Between the Three

  • Need the lowest headline rate and have straightforward UK income: a mainstream remortgage
  • Need to complete in weeks against a hard deadline: bridging finance
  • Income, assets or ownership structure sit outside a conventional UK lender's criteria: structured equity release

Why This Decision Matters More in Today's Market

With prime central London prices still 10 to 29 percent below their 2014 peak in postcodes like Knightsbridge and Belgravia, and supply constrained into 2026, selling a property to raise capital is, for many owners, the least attractive option on the table. Understanding which financing route actually fits your situation, rather than defaulting to whichever one a private banker or broker mentions first, is often the difference between accessing capital in weeks and losing months to an application that was never going to succeed.

About Global Mortgage Group

Global Mortgage Group (GMG) is a Singapore-headquartered cross-border real estate finance firm operating across 23+ jurisdictions, specialising in equity release, bridging loans and structured property finance for international property owners. GMG works with private clients, family offices and their advisers to unlock capital held in prime residential real estate.

Donald Klip, Co-Founder and CIO

[email protected] | +65 9773 0273 | www.gmg.asia

This is the second article in GMG's Unlocked in the UK series. The next article examines how the UK's non-dom regime changes are reshaping financing decisions for international owners.

Unlocked in the UK: Releasing Equity from Prime London Property

Prime London townhouses in Knightsbridge and Belgravia representing locked property equity for international owners

Across Knightsbridge, Mayfair, Belgravia and the wider prime London postcodes, a striking pattern has emerged. Thousands of property owners are sitting on tens of millions of pounds in unrealised value, held in homes that have barely moved in price for over a decade, while the capital they need for a new investment, a business opportunity or a family transition sits locked behind the walls of a house they are not ready to sell.

Speak to GMG about releasing equity from your UK property. Donald Klip, Co-Founder, Global Mortgage Group. 

[email protected] | +65 9773 0273 | www.gmg.asia

This is the paradox at the centre of prime central London real estate today. Values in Knightsbridge and Belgravia remain roughly 29% below their 2014 peak. Chelsea sits around 20% below its own high. Across prime London as a whole, prices are effectively back to where they stood twelve years ago. For an owner who bought before the peak, or who inherited a family home decades ago, this is not a paper loss they feel day to day. It is simply a very large, very illiquid asset that has quietly become disconnected from their current financial needs.

At the same time, international demand for these addresses has not gone away. Buyers from the United States, the Gulf, Hong Kong, Singapore, mainland China, India and Nigeria continue to account for more than half of all transactions in Mayfair and Knightsbridge. A wave of departing non-domiciled residents sold their principal UK homes through 2025, and a new generation of international owners, younger, more globally mobile, often holding property through trusts, family offices or offshore structures, has stepped in to replace them. Supply has tightened sharply into 2026, with new listings down significantly on the ten-year average, even as this new ownership base grows.

Why Equity Release Matters More in This Cycle Than the Last

In a rising market, owners rarely think about the equity trapped in a property, because a sale or a conventional remortgage can usually solve most problems. In a market like today's, flat on the surface, deeply discounted from peak in the postcodes that matter most, and thin on supply, the calculus changes. Selling into a market that Coutts and Knight Frank both describe as offering rare value for buyers is, for many owners, the wrong move at the wrong time. Waiting for a full recovery before accessing capital may mean waiting years.

This is precisely the gap that equity release, bridging finance and structured lending against UK property are built to close. Rather than selling a Mayfair townhouse or a Knightsbridge lateral apartment to fund a new venture, a divorce settlement, a business expansion or the purchase of a second home, an owner can borrow against the value already sitting in the property, often without disturbing existing tenancies, family arrangements or long-term ownership plans.

"Prime London property owners are asset rich and, more often than most people assume, cash constrained. Our work is not about lending against a home in the abstract. It is about understanding an owner's full cross-border picture, the trust that holds the freehold, the currency they earn in, the jurisdiction they will spend the proceeds in, and structuring a facility around that reality rather than a generic UK mortgage template."
Donald Klip, Co-Founder and CIO, Global Mortgage Group

A Market Built for Cross-Border Owners, Not Domestic Ones

Prime central London has never really been a domestic market. Over half of all transactions above the entry-prime threshold involve an international buyer, and an even higher share of the very top end, the £15 million-plus super-prime segment tracked annually by Beauchamp Estates, is owned through offshore vehicles, family trusts or corporate structures rather than in an individual's own name. Standard UK high-street mortgage underwriting, built around PAYE income and UK tax returns, was never designed for this ownership base.

That mismatch is where GMG operates. As a cross-border real estate finance firm working across more than 23 jurisdictions, GMG structures lending around the borrower's actual financial life, a Hong Kong-based executive with income in three currencies, a Gulf family office holding a Belgravia townhouse through a British Virgin Islands company, a Singapore-based entrepreneur who wants to draw on a Marylebone flat to fund a UK business acquisition. The common thread is a UK asset that does not fit neatly into a conventional lender's checklist, and an owner who needs a lender fluent in the cross-border detail rather than one asking them to simplify their life to fit the form.

What This Series Covers

  • Foundation: how equity release, bridging and remortgage differ, and how the non-dom regime changes reshape financing decisions
  • Area guides: Knightsbridge, Mayfair, Belgravia, Chelsea, Notting Hill, Marylebone, St John's Wood, Canary Wharf and the outer-prime alternatives
  • University and education buyers: parents purchasing near Oxford, Cambridge, UCL, Imperial and LSE
  • Borrower profiles: the non-dom exit seller, the departing expat, the business owner, the family office, the auction buyer and the landlord
  • Nationality guides: financing considerations for US, GCC, Hong Kong, Singapore, mainland Chinese, Indian, Nigerian, South African and Pakistani buyers
  • Strategy: buying into a discounted cycle, FX timing, and exit planning as the market recovers

Who This Series Is For

This series is written for three overlapping audiences. The first is existing prime London property owners, often based overseas, who hold significant equity in a UK home and are weighing whether to sell, remortgage, or release equity to fund something else entirely. The second is prospective buyers, particularly international parents and family offices considering a London purchase for the first time, who need to understand how financing actually works when the borrower's income, assets and tax residence span several countries. The third is the private bankers, wealth managers and family office advisers who sit alongside these clients and need a clear-eyed view of what is and is not possible in today's lending environment.

Over the course of this series, we will work through each of these questions in detail, postcode by postcode, borrower profile by borrower profile, nationality by nationality, with the same practical focus throughout, how to unlock the value already sitting in a UK property, without giving up the property itself.

About Global Mortgage Group

Global Mortgage Group (GMG) is a Singapore-headquartered cross-border real estate finance firm operating across 23+ jurisdictions, specialising in equity release, bridging loans and structured property finance for international property owners. GMG works with private clients, family offices and their advisers to unlock capital held in prime residential real estate.

Donald Klip, Co-Founder and CIO

[email protected] | +65 9773 0273 | www.gmg.asia

This is the first article in GMG's Unlocked in the UK series. The next article examines the difference between equity release, bridging finance and remortgaging, and which one actually fits your situation.

Unlocked in Thailand: Why Thai Banks Refuse to Lend to Foreign Property Owners

Thai bank branch exterior in Bangkok representing the barriers foreign property owners face when seeking financing

It is one of the most common questions asked by foreigners who own property in Thailand. I have owned my condo for ten years. It is worth millions of baht. Why will no Thai bank lend against it?

If you've been told no by a Thai bank, Global Mortgage Group can help you understand what options actually exist. Contact Donald Klip to start the conversation. 

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

The answer is not arbitrary. It is structural, legal, and deeply embedded in the Thai financial and regulatory system. Understanding why Thai banks will not lend to you is the first step toward understanding where you can actually find financing.

The Legal Foundation of the Problem

Thailand's approach to foreign property ownership is governed primarily by two pieces of legislation: the Land Code Act B.E. 2497 (1954) and the Condominium Act B.E. 2522 (1979). The Land Code Act is the foundational restriction. It prohibits foreign nationals from owning land in Thailand outright. Any foreigner who wants to own a house, a villa, or commercial land must do so through a structure, a long-term lease, a Thai company, or a BOI-approved vehicle.

The Condominium Act creates the main exception. It allows foreign nationals to own condominium units on a freehold basis, subject to the condition that no more than 49% of the total floor area of any given building is foreign-owned. Within this foreign quota, a foreigner holds genuine, registerable, transferable title to their unit. But this still does not unlock Thai bank financing. Thai banks are regulated by the Bank of Thailand. Their lending practices, risk frameworks, and collateral requirements are built around domestic borrowers with domestically registerable security interests, and for foreign borrowers, that infrastructure simply does not apply.

The Collateral Problem

A bank lends against collateral because collateral is what it can recover if the borrower defaults. For a Thai bank lending to a Thai national against Thai land, this process is well understood and legally straightforward. The bank registers a mortgage at the Land Department. If the borrower defaults, the bank can foreclose and sell.

For a foreign borrower, the picture is very different. Even though a foreigner can own a condo unit in freehold, the mechanics of registering and enforcing a mortgage against that unit in favour of a Thai bank are complicated by questions of foreign borrower status, enforcement rights, and the practical realities of dealing with a non-resident borrower in default. Thai banks, facing these complications and lacking institutional frameworks to manage them, have simply chosen not to lend to foreign nationals against Thai property.

IMPORTANT DISTINCTION

It is not illegal for a Thai bank to lend to a foreigner against a Thai condo. Thai banks choose not to. The distinction matters because the door is not legally closed, it is institutionally closed. And where Thai banks have closed the door, specialist lenders have opened a different one.

"The Thai banking system was not built for the foreign property owner. But the foreign property owner's needs did not disappear just because the banks chose not to serve them."
Donald Klip, Global Mortgage Group

Global Mortgage Group has structured financing solutions for foreign property owners across Bangkok, Phuket, Pattaya, Koh Samui, and Chiang Mai. Speak to Donald Klip about your situation. Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

The Income Verification Problem

Even setting aside collateral issues, Thai banks face another fundamental obstacle with foreign borrowers: income verification. Thai banks assess a borrower's ability to repay based on income documented through Thai tax returns, Thai salary slips, and Thai business records. A foreign national whose income is earned offshore, in the UK, Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, or anywhere else, cannot provide Thai income documentation, because their income is not Thai.

Thai banks are not equipped to assess foreign income. They cannot read UK payslips, verify Australian tax returns, or evaluate Hong Kong business accounts. Their credit assessment systems are built for domestic income in domestic currency. Foreign income is, for practical purposes, invisible to them. This compounds the collateral problem. The rational institutional response is to simply not participate, and that is exactly what Thai banks do.

The Foreign Exchange Dimension

When a foreigner buys a condominium in Thailand, they are required to bring foreign currency into Thailand and convert it through a Thai bank, generating a Foreign Exchange Transaction Form, commonly known as an FET form or TT3 form. This document is critical: it is the proof that foreign funds were used to purchase the condo, and it is required to repatriate sale proceeds when the unit is eventually sold.

Any financing arrangement for a foreign property owner in Thailand needs to be structured with the FET framework in mind. Thai banks, already not lending to foreigners, have not developed the product infrastructure to handle the foreign exchange dimensions of such lending. Non-bank lenders and cross-border specialists, by contrast, have built their products around these realities.

What About Foreign Banks in Thailand?

Thailand has a number of foreign banks operating through local branches, HSBC, Citibank, Standard Chartered, UOB, and others have had or continue to have a Thai presence. In practice, these institutions offer little more than Thai banks do for the foreign property owner.

Foreign banks operating in Thailand are subject to the same Bank of Thailand regulatory framework as domestic banks, and their local lending products are similarly built around domestic Thai norms. While some foreign bank branches have occasionally offered mortgage products to high-net-worth foreign clients with existing banking relationships, this is not a systematic product offering and is not a solution for the broad population of foreign property owners in Thailand.

The Non-Bank Alternative

The gap left by Thai banks has created a market. Where institutional lenders will not go, private capital does. Non-bank lenders, private credit funds, specialist bridging loan providers, and cross-border mortgage specialists have all developed products aimed at the foreign property owner in Thailand who needs liquidity. These products are different from conventional bank mortgages in structure, cost, and purpose, but they are real, available, and for many foreign owners represent the only viable path to accessing the equity in their Thai property.

If you own property in Thailand and have been told by a Thai bank that they cannot help you, you have been told the truth, about that bank. You have not been told the whole story about what is possible. The articles that follow in this series map the full landscape of what is actually available. The Thai banking system is not the end of the road. It is simply the wrong road for this particular journey.

Ready To Unlock Your Thai Property?


Global Mortgage Group specialises in cross-border property finance for foreign owners across Thailand. 

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

Unlocked in Thailand: You Own Property in Thailand. So Why Can’t You Access the Equity?

Foreign-owned condominium skyline in Bangkok, Thailand representing locked property equity for foreign owners

You bought smart. Maybe it was a condo in Sukhumvit when the market was still undervalued. A villa in Phuket before the tourist boom went parabolic. A riverfront unit in Bangkok that is now worth three times what you paid. On paper, you are wealthy. In reality, you cannot touch a baht of it.

To explore what equity release options may be available on your Thai property, speak to Donald Klip directly. 

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

This is the defining financial paradox for foreign property owners in Thailand, and it affects tens of thousands of people who have no idea that solutions are available to them. This article is the beginning of that conversation.

The Scale of the Problem

Thailand is one of the most popular destinations in the world for foreign property ownership. Hundreds of thousands of foreigners own condominiums, leasehold villas, and commercial units across Bangkok, Phuket, Pattaya, Koh Samui, Chiang Mai, and beyond. The Thai condo market alone has seen decades of foreign participation, with buyers from the UK, Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Germany, Russia, China, and across the Middle East and Scandinavia all accumulating significant holdings.

For many of those owners, their Thai property represents one of their largest individual assets. Some bought for lifestyle. Some bought for investment. Some bought for retirement. All of them assumed that owning real estate, as they would anywhere in the world, meant they could eventually borrow against it.

That assumption is wrong. And the consequences of getting it wrong can be severe.

"For foreign property owners in Thailand, equity is not a financial tool. It is a number on a piece of paper that the banking system will not acknowledge."
Donald Klip, Global Mortgage Group

Global Mortgage Group works with foreign property owners across Thailand to structure equity release, bridging loans, and cross-border financing solutions that Thai banks cannot offer. 

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

Why the Equity Is Locked

In most countries, the basic mechanics of property finance are straightforward. You own an asset. The asset has value. A lender agrees to advance funds against that value, secured by a charge over the property. You access liquidity without selling.

In Thailand, that chain breaks at multiple points for foreign owners. Thai commercial banks, such as Bangkok Bank, Kasikorn, SCB, Krung Thai, and the rest, do not lend to foreign nationals against Thai property. This is not a policy buried in the fine print. It is a structural reality of the Thai banking system. Foreign ownership of land is prohibited under the Land Code Act, and while foreigners can own condominium units under the Condominium Act, the banking sector has never developed the infrastructure, risk appetite, or legal framework to extend mortgage credit to non-residents against those assets.

Even foreigners who have lived in Thailand for decades, who hold long-stay visas, who pay Thai taxes and run Thai businesses. They cannot walk into a Thai bank and borrow against their condo. The system simply was not built for them.

The Ownership Structure Makes It Worse

Foreign property in Thailand is held in one of several structures, and each creates its own borrowing complications. Freehold condominium ownership is the cleanest. Under the Condominium Act, foreigners can own up to 49% of the total floor area of any condominium building outright, in their own name, on a freehold basis. This is genuine ownership. You hold the title, the Chanote deed is in your name, and the asset is yours in the fullest legal sense available to a foreigner in Thailand. But even freehold condo ownership does not unlock Thai bank financing. The banks will not lend against it.

Leasehold structures are more complicated still. Many foreigners, particularly those who own villas, houses, or commercial property outside the condo sector, hold their assets on 30-year leases, sometimes with renewal options. A leasehold interest is a diminishing asset by definition. Its value declines as the lease term shortens. Most lenders, even private ones, approach leasehold security with caution.

Then there are Thai company structures, where a foreigner holds shares in a Thai limited company that in turn owns land or property. These arrangements exist in a legal grey zone. They are common, but they are not straightforward from a financing perspective, and lenders who will consider them at all apply significant additional scrutiny.

KEY INSIGHT

The type of ownership structure you hold, freehold condo, leasehold villa, or Thai company, directly determines what financing options are available to you. There is no one-size-fits-all answer. But in all three cases, Thai banks are not part of the solution.

What Foreign Owners Actually Do

Faced with a banking system that will not serve them, foreign property owners in Thailand typically do one of three things. They sell, the nuclear option that destroys the asset to free the value. They borrow elsewhere, using unsecured facilities in their home country that do not reflect the underlying Thai asset value. Or they do nothing, accepting that the equity is inaccessible and watching the opportunity cost accumulate.

What almost none of them do, because they do not know it exists, is access the specialist cross-border and non-bank financing solutions that are actually available to foreign property owners in Thailand.

The Solutions Do Exist

The Thai banking system may be closed to foreign borrowers. But the Thai banking system is not the only option. A growing ecosystem of private lenders, non-bank financial institutions, and cross-border specialists have developed products specifically designed for foreign property owners who need to access equity trapped in Thai assets. These include:

  • Kai Faak, a uniquely Thai private lending mechanism that operates outside the banking system and has been used for generations by Thai property owners to raise short-term capital against real estate
  • Non-bank bridging loans, short-term facilities secured against Thai property, structured by private credit providers and specialist lenders who understand the foreign ownership landscape
  • Cross-border equity release, using the value of your Thai property as supporting collateral for financing arranged through institutions in Singapore, Hong Kong, Australia, the UK, or the US
  • Developer and vendor finance, in specific circumstances, arrangements that allow owners to access capital through structured sale-and-leaseback mechanisms

Who This Series Is For

UNLOCKED IN THAILAND is written for the foreign national who owns Thai property and wants to understand their financing options. Whether you are sitting on a Bangkok condo that has tripled in value, a Phuket villa generating rental income you cannot efficiently repatriate, or a Chiang Mai property you bought for retirement and now need to work harder. This series is the resource that did not exist until now.

Over the articles that follow, we cover the mechanics of Kai Faak, the structure of non-bank bridging loans, the role of leasehold versus freehold in determining your options, market-by-market analysis from Bangkok to Phuket to Pattaya, and building-by-building guidance for the most popular condominiums with foreign ownership. This is the complete guide. Let's start at the beginning.

Ready To Unlock Your Thai Property?

Global Mortgage Group specialises in cross-border property finance for foreign owners across Thailand. 

Donald Klip | [email protected] | +65 9773-0273 | gmg.asia

The Rise of Corporate Private Credit in Asia Pacific: Market Outlook, Trends and What It Means for Borrowers

Asia Pacific corporate finance professionals discussing private credit market trends and investment opportunities

Donald Klip's annual perspective on the state of corporate private credit in Asia Pacific — where the market is, where it is going, and what it means for the operating companies, CFOs, and advisors who need to navigate it. 

Published by 

Donald Klip | Co-Founder, Global Mortgage Group | Head, GMG Capital Advisory 

30 years of institutional finance. Former hedge fund founder. Senior roles at top global investment banks. GMG Capital Advisory arranges private credit and special situations finance of $10M–$100M for operating companies across Asia Pacific. 

[email protected] | +65 9773 0273 | Singapore · Hong Kong | Asia-Pacific 

Private credit in Asia Pacific has crossed from emerging market status to structural market reality in the space of five years. When I began positioning GMG Capital Advisory in this space, private credit was a concept that many Asia Pacific CFOs and business owners had heard of but never accessed. Today, it is a financing solution that an increasing share of the region's most sophisticated corporate borrowers are using as their first call rather than their last resort. 

Private credit in Asia Pacific is not a cycle. It is a structural shift in how mid-market corporate capital is allocated. The businesses and advisors who understand this early will have a significant advantage over those who do not. 

Where the Market Stands 

Asia Pacific private credit assets under management exceeded $150 billion in 2024, having more than doubled over five years. The growth has been driven by both supply and demand dynamics that are reinforcing each other. 

On the supply side, institutional investors: pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies, and family offices, have dramatically increased their allocations to private credit as a yield-enhancement and portfolio diversification strategy. In a world where public fixed income yields have been persistently low and equity volatility persistently high, private credit's combination of predictable income, floating rate protection, and attractive risk-adjusted returns has been compelling. 

On the demand side, the systematic withdrawal of bank credit from the mid-market has created a capital gap that private credit is uniquely positioned to fill. The regulatory forces driving bank credit tightening are not temporary. They are the new baseline. The demand for private credit from Asia Pacific mid-market operating companies will continue to grow. 

The Most Important Trends 

Sector specialisation is deepening 

The early phase of Asia Pacific private credit was largely generalist, lenders would finance anything creditworthy regardless of sector. The market is now maturing into sector-specific specialisation. Data centre and digital infrastructure finance has emerged as one of the most active and best-capitalised segments. Energy transition finance: renewables, biofuels, SAF, storage, is attracting dedicated capital pools. Healthcare, logistics, and agribusiness are developing their own specialist lender communities. This specialisation is good for borrowers: sector-specialist lenders bring deeper understanding, faster credit decisions, and more appropriate structures for industry-specific collateral. 

AI infrastructure is creating a new asset class 

The AI infrastructure buildout across Asia Pacific is generating capital requirements that have no precedent in the region's credit history. Data centre capacity requirements from hyperscalers, the power infrastructure needed to support AI compute, and the supply chain investments required to build and maintain GPU clusters are all creating financing needs that conventional bank credit frameworks are not equipped to meet. Private credit lenders who understand the hyperscaler contract dynamics, the power procurement landscape, and the GPU market will be among the most active and most important capital providers in the region over the next five years. 

Cross-border transactions are growing 

Asia Pacific's operating company economy is becoming more cross-border, not less. Supply chains, customer bases, ownership structures, and investment horizons all increasingly span multiple jurisdictions. The financing solutions needed by these businesses must match their geographic footprint. Private credit lenders with genuine multi-jurisdiction capability, like GMG Capital Advisory with our 23+ jurisdiction platform, are better positioned than those serving only single markets. 

Family offices are becoming direct lenders 

Singapore and Hong Kong host an increasingly large and sophisticated family office community. These family offices are progressively moving from investing in private credit funds to making direct private credit investments themselves, providing capital directly to operating companies at deal sizes from $5M to $50M. This development is expanding the supply of private credit capital in the region. 

The advisor community is catching up 

Private bankers, EAMs, and independent advisors are increasingly including private credit in the toolkit of solutions they bring to HNWI business owner clients. The most sophisticated advisors 

are now proactively raising private credit as a solution for clients with corporate finance problems. The trend will accelerate as the track record of successful private credit transactions in the region continues to build. 

What It Means for Operating Companies and CFOs 

The single most important implication of the private credit market's development in Asia Pacific is this: the financing options available to mid-market operating companies are significantly broader than they were five years ago. The capital gap that banks have created is being filled by a diverse, growing, and increasingly sophisticated private credit market. 

CFOs and business owners who understand this, who have mapped the private credit landscape, built relationships with specialist advisors, and positioned their businesses to access non-bank capital when needed, will have a significant financing advantage over those who have not. 

GMG Capital Advisory's Commitment 

I started GMG Capital Advisory because I saw the mid-market financing gap in Asia Pacific and believed that institutional-grade underwriting, genuine regional coverage, and a focus on the $10M–$100M segment could build something genuinely valuable for operating companies in the region. 

The 41 articles in The Debt Desk series represent our commitment to making the private credit market transparent and accessible for the business owners, CFOs, and advisors who need to navigate it. We publish this content because an informed market is a better market, for borrowers, for lenders, and for the businesses and advisors who work in it. 

If you have a corporate financing requirement that your bank cannot meet, contact us. That is what we are here for. 

About GMG Capital Advisory 

Donald Klip | Co-Founder, Global Mortgage Group | Head, GMG Capital Advisory 

Donald Klip has 30 years of institutional finance experience spanning hedge fund management and senior roles at the world’s top global investment banks. GMG Capital Advisory specialises in arranging and structuring corporate debt financing of $10M–$100M for operating companies, asset owners, and project sponsors where conventional bank lending is unavailable, insufficient, or too slow. We operate across 23+ jurisdictions in Asia Pacific. 

www.gmg.asia | [email protected] | +65 9773 0273 | Singapore · Hong Kong 

The Debt Desk 

Corporate private credit intelligence for Asia Pacific’s $10M–$100M middle market. Published by GMG Capital Advisory. Part of the Private Credit Asia content series. 

www.gmg.asia | Read all 41 articles in the series