Why Banks Across Asia Pacific Are Tightening Corporate Lending: A Country-by-Country Breakdown

Explore why banks across Asia Pacific are tightening corporate lending and how private credit is becoming a key funding alternative.

The specific regulatory, structural, and market forces driving corporate credit tightening in each major Asia Pacific market and what operating companies can do about it.

Published by

Donald Klip  |  Co-Founder, Global Mortgage Group  |  Head, GMG Capital Advisory

30 years of institutional finance. Former hedge fund founder. Senior roles at top global investment banks. GMG Capital Advisory arranges private credit and special situations finance of $10M–$100M for operating companies across Asia Pacific.

[email protected]   |   +65 9773 0273   |   Singapore · Hong Kong   |   Asia-Pacific  

The headline story that bank corporate lending is tightening across Asia Pacific is well understood by most CFOs and business owners who have tried to access or renew credit facilities in the past two years. What is less well understood are the specific forces at work in each market.

Bank credit tightening in Asia Pacific is not one story, it is fourteen stories with a common theme. Understanding the specific dynamics in your market is essential to navigating them.

Singapore

Singapore’s three major local banks DBS, OCBC, and UOB have responded to the Basel III and IV environment by prioritising three categories of business: wealth management and private banking, large institutional corporate and trade finance, and retail mortgages. The consequence for mid-market operating companies is that credit decisions are increasingly made at specialist credit business unit level, timelines have extended significantly, minimum ticket sizes have risen, and sector restrictions have expanded. Foreign-owned businesses and cross-border structures face particular scrutiny.

Australia

The Banking Royal Commission triggered a wholesale tightening of credit standards across Australia’s big four banks. They have since systematically reduced commercial lending exposure in favour of residential mortgages. Regional and rural businesses, hospitality, retail, and property development have been disproportionately affected.

Malaysia

Bank Negara Malaysia has implemented progressive tightening of provisioning requirements. Domestic banks have concentrated their corporate lending books on government-linked companies and large established corporations. Independent operating companies particularly those without GLC affiliations or with foreign ownership face significantly longer credit timelines and higher collateral requirements.

Indonesia

Indonesia’s banking system is dominated by state-owned banks that prioritise state-linked enterprises. Foreign ownership restrictions create structural barriers to collateral registration and enforcement that make domestic banks reluctant to lend to foreign-affiliated entities regardless of credit quality. Private credit arranged through offshore holding entities is often the only practical route.

Thailand

Thailand’s banking system is concentrated and centralised. The Land Code and Business of Foreigners Act create specific constraints on collateral registration for non-Thai entities. Private credit arranged through appropriate offshore structures has become the dominant financing channel for foreign-owned operating companies in Thailand.

Philippines

The Philippine banking system is dominated by family-controlled conglomerates whose affiliated banks prioritise lending within their own corporate ecosystems. Independent mid-market companies and foreign-owned businesses sit outside these ecosystems and face limited options, slow processes, and conservative terms.

India

India’s public sector banks accumulated enormous NPA books, triggering a prolonged period of extremely conservative corporate lending standards. Foreign-owned businesses and internationally structured entities face additional barriers: FEMA compliance requirements, RBI approval for certain cross-border debt structures, and domestic bank unfamiliarity with international corporate structures.

Japan

Japan’s banking system is characterised by keiretsu relationships. For businesses outside a keiretsu including virtually all foreign-owned or foreign-managed businesses the domestic banking system is effectively closed for meaningful corporate credit.

South Korea

Korea’s banking system allocates the majority of corporate credit to chaebol-affiliated companies and large domestic corporations. Mid-market independents particularly those without chaebol or government affiliations are chronically underserved.

Taiwan

Taiwan’s banking system prioritises government-linked and large corporate relationships. The export-oriented manufacturing and technology base that forms the backbone of the Taiwanese economy is chronically underfunded, particularly for cross-border expansion and international acquisition financing.

Hong Kong

Hong Kong’s banking system is overwhelmingly focused on real estate, trade finance, and large corporate lending. Mid-market operating company credit particularly for businesses without significant property collateral is difficult to access. Hong Kong is most valuable as a cross-border financing hub for businesses with offshore holding structures.

New Zealand

New Zealand’s four major banks are all subsidiaries of Australian parents and apply substantially similar credit frameworks. As the Australian parents have tightened, so have their New Zealand subsidiaries. Businesses outside agricultural and residential property sectors face increasing difficulty accessing corporate credit at meaningful scale.

What Operating Companies Should Do

The common thread across all markets is that mid-market operating companies particularly those with foreign ownership, cross-border structures, or operations in restricted sectors can no longer rely on domestic bank credit as their primary corporate financing channel. Private credit, arranged through experienced specialists with genuine regional presence, is the most effective alternative.

About GMG Capital Advisory

Donald Klip  |  Co-Founder, Global Mortgage Group  |  Head, GMG Capital Advisory

Donald Klip has 30 years of institutional finance experience spanning hedge fund management and senior roles at the world’s top global investment banks. GMG Capital Advisory specialises in arranging and structuring corporate debt financing of $10M–$100M for operating companies, asset owners, and project sponsors where conventional bank lending is unavailable, insufficient, or too slow. We operate across 23+ jurisdictions in Asia Pacific.

www.gmg.asia   |   [email protected]   |   +65 9773 0273   |   Singapore · Hong Kong 

The Debt Desk

Corporate private credit intelligence for Asia Pacific’s $10M–$100M middle market. Published by GMG Capital Advisory. Part of the Private Credit Asia content series.

www.gmg.asia   |   Read all 41 articles in the series